Sunday, January 13, 2008

Environment Status Report extract

EXTRACT ON ESR FROM PCEF MINUTES 6 Oct 2007

Environment Status Report

As decided in the inception meeting of the PCEF, one of the tasks that the Forum should take up is the development of a framework for the Environment Status Report ESR). This is a mandatory annual report that municipalities in Maharashtra are required to produce.

The process agreed upon at the meeting is:

1. A core group consisting of Aneeta Benninger, Ranjit Gadgil, Himanshu Kulkarni, Sanskriti Menon, Laxmi Narayan, Ajay Ojha, Vijay Paranjpye (and expandable as per needs) should be set up, to
develop an overall framework for the report and for individual chapters
work with the PCEF theme groups and additional groups/ individuals to take up responsibilities for the development of various sections of the ESR, including Indicators for each theme
review and edit the drafts submitted by each group
submit a budget to the PMC for developing the framework and content

2. The minutes of this meeting are to be considered as the formal communication to PCEF from PMC to begin work on the ESR

3. Decisions related to content and framework:
a. Currently ESR focuses on PMC’s contribution to environment management. However, achievements by NGOs, Corporates, Citizens Forums and their best practices should be a part of the ESR.
b. The ESR should report on ecological carrying capacity and the footprint of the city and not only sectoral environmental status. This paradigm of environmental status reporting can take into account the impacts of Pune such as due to the sourcing of water from catchments outside Pune and releasing effluents without treatment.
c. A document containing the framework and benchmarks for various sectors of the ESR is one deliverable. This would help to standardize the future ESRs and make them comparable and over time to reveal the changing status of environment
d. Methods for collecting and reviewing data should be standardized; thus data gaps in current data collection systems should also be identified
e. ESR should be based on ‘spatial and temporal’ approach because environmental changes do not happen in sectors. Performance of each municipal ward must be reviewed, ranked and linked to budget allocation. ESR should have two components – status of municipal services offered and status of ambient environment.
f. An ongoing data compilation process may be developed so that data and information from diverse sources can be gathered at one location (online and as a repository)
g. The ESR should be uploaded on the PMC website
h. ESR should have relevant indicators from the Human Development Index (HDI).


ESR - Possible Reporting Framework

See CEROI – City Environment Reports on the Internet http://ceroi.net/index.htm

Environment Status Rerport extract

EXTRACT ON ESR FROM PCEF MINUTES 6 Oct 2007

Environment Status Report
As decided in the inception meeting of the PCEF, one of the tasks that the Forum should take up is the development of a framework for the Environment Status Report ESR). This is a mandatory annual report that municipalities in Maharashtra are required to produce.

The process agreed upon at the meeting is:

1. A core group consisting of Aneeta Benninger, Ranjit Gadgil, Himanshu Kulkarni, Sanskriti Menon, Laxmi Narayan, Ajay Ojha, Vijay Paranjpye (and expandable as per needs) should be set up, to
develop an overall framework for the report and for individual chapters
work with the PCEF theme groups and additional groups/ individuals to take up responsibilities for the development of various sections of the ESR, including Indicators for each theme
review and edit the drafts submitted by each group
submit a budget to the PMC for developing the framework and content

2. The minutes of this meeting are to be considered as the formal communication to PCEF from PMC to begin work on the ESR

3. Decisions related to content and framework:
a. Currently ESR focuses on PMC’s contribution to environment management. However, achievements by NGOs, Corporates, Citizens Forums and their best practices should be a part of the ESR.
b. The ESR should report on ecological carrying capacity and the footprint of the city and not only sectoral environmental status. This paradigm of environmental status reporting can take into account the impacts of Pune such as due to the sourcing of water from catchments outside Pune and releasing effluents without treatment.
c. A document containing the framework and benchmarks for various sectors of the ESR is one deliverable. This would help to standardize the future ESRs and make them comparable and over time to reveal the changing status of environment
d. Methods for collecting and reviewing data should be standardized; thus data gaps in current data collection systems should also be identified
e. ESR should be based on ‘spatial and temporal’ approach because environmental changes do not happen in sectors. Performance of each municipal ward must be reviewed, ranked and linked to budget allocation. ESR should have two components – status of municipal services offered and status of ambient environment.
f. An ongoing data compilation process may be developed so that data and information from diverse sources can be gathered at one location (online and as a repository)
g. The ESR should be uploaded on the PMC website
h. ESR should have relevant indicators from the Human Development Index (HDI).
ESR - Possible Reporting Framework

(From CEROI – City Environment Reports on the Internet http://ceroi.net/index.htm)

DPSIR
Driving forces
Pressures
State
Impact
Response

PCEF Biodiversity Group 10 Jan report

PCEF Biodiversity Group

1) A Pune Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan is proposed (TBD)
a) Dr. Bharucha stressed on need to establish linkages between theme groups of PCEF; especially among biodiversity, public and school education, water and DC Rules as these issues are closely interlinked.
b) It was agreed by all that the PBSAP process needs to be conducted in PCMC, Cantonments and other privately owned areas instead of just PMC limits. Pune University, NCL, NIA, Tata campus, MIDC, MIT, BVIEER, Sindh Society, Automobile Research Institute, Joseph school, Loyola school, Agriculture College, Ferguson college, Law College, Koregaon Park were some of the areas suggested for this process.
c) Mr. Khaire suggested that monitoring biodiversity should be first step of this process. He suggested that the group should decide methodology for this survey and PBR Process might be a good option for this.
d) Dr. Bharucha suggested that a list of organizations be made that can involve themselves in PBSAP process. A grid of factors to be surveyed, survey methods and partners may be made as starting point. Dr. Bharucha and Mr. Khaire suggested a period of 6 months for making the grid and survey of biodiversity. Raghu Velankar will make framework for this grid and it will be finalized after incorporation of suggestions made by the group members.
e) Sanskriti Menon suggested additional factors like ownership of biodiversity rich areas; their legal status (contentious issues) should be covered in this grid so that PBSAP process can be comprehensive. She added that PMC could initiate dialogue within PMC and with other controlling authorities, departments to generate support for the PBSAP process. Mr. Khaire agreed for this
f) Dr. Bharucha expressed need for a 'Biodiversity Vision' for Pune city. He said while changes in Pune's landscape, habitats, ecosystems and bio-diversity are discussed, the city also need to decide future course of action. The vision is important part of this process. It was agreed that partner organizations would draft their vision, which will be discussed later to evolve a common vision. (This is in fact part of the PBSAP process)
g) The document on the suggested process for PBSAP is available at www.pcef.blogspot.com

2) Dr. Bharucha suggested widening base of Biodiversity group to make the process participatory and comprehensive. He suggested that Dr. Sanjeev Nalavade, Dr. Anil Mahabal and Retired Forest Officers Organization should be invited to be part of PCEF. Others added Dr. Gole so that UoP can be covered along with Environment studies, zoology and botany courses. He offered support of BVIEER students to do surveys of biodiversity. He informed that assessment of various thesis reports is being done by Ms. Ruby to gather available baseline data. Similar exercise can be done with other academic institutes. Ms. Anchal expressed willingness to contact Pune University departments for the same purpose.
(some done and other contacts underway)

3) Discussions on Baner Biodiversity Reserve (see attached table) – need to convert to management plan and to address issue of ownership

4) Dr. Bharucha suggested that the biodiversity group should make a booklet on parks. It may include existing data, objectives of parks, contribution by different stakeholders etc. This will help to evoke more participation and publicize efforts by the PCEF. A timeline of 3 months has been decided. Mr. Khaire informed that the PMC would support printing of these booklets if the biodiversity group develops its content and design.

5) Dr. Bharucha raised issue of strategy for nature interpretation centre and awareness activities.
a) A note on this will be circulated by BVIEER, which can be discussed further.
b) Mr. Khaire suggested that biodiversity group should make one-year module containing different education activities for various social sectors.
c) Need to revive Tree Walks (conducted by CEE, INTACH, RANWA) was expressed by Dr. Bharucha. It was agreed that a common framework and suggested content be developed under these modules so that uniform message would be spread by the PCEF. Mr. Khaire said that he is already thinking of printing "Rare trees of Pune" Marthi book of CEE with few more introductions of species and has spoken to Kiran Purandare about it.

6) Dr. Bharucha enquired if PMC has adequate number of saplings of indigenous species required for plantation purpose across city. He suggested that many private nurseries might be assigned this task based on assessment of requirement conducted by the PMC. Mr Khaire mentioned that Garden dep't has two nurseries and he has already instructed them to start building up stock of indigenous species based on demand by citizens.

PCEF Traffic and Transportation Group 10 Jan docs

Pune Traffic and Transportation
Framework for Environment Status Report


Policy and legislative framework
National Urban Transport Policy
Report on the Working Group for the 11th Five Year Plan on Urban Transport including MRTS (not yet passed into law)
Draft concept note on Pune’s transport vision pending legislative approval for two years
Committee recently appointed by State Government to ‘look into Pune’s transport problems’. Unclear what their mandate/role is.
No other known policy or body.

Responsible agencies
PMC: Road building, maintenance; signals; footpaths; cycle tracks; parks; parking lots; deciding on one-ways, no-entry roads etc. including IRDP roads, flyovers etc.
PCMC and the cantonment boards: Similar roles within their areas?
Traffic Police: Enforcing traffic rules (signals, parking, driving without license); fining offenders; dealing with accidents etc.
RTO: Issuing licenses to people, vehicles to ply.

Indicators
Three kinds of indicators:
Economic indicators: To reflect economic impact of transportation
Social indicators: To reflect impact of transportation on equity, community, human issues
Environmental indicators: To reflect environmental impacts.

Ideally, these indicators should be used in an environment where there are specific goals to be achieved, targets to be met – in other words, the city has a vision with respect to these issues. Today in Pune, we do not have the luxury of such a vision, but it will still be a useful thing to benchmark where we are even if we are not sure where we want to go.

The list of indicators can be much more elaborate than what is listed here, but it may be good to begin with a small set of indicators while being aware that other indicators also should be considered in future. Such indicators are listed in the final section.

Economic indicators
Average time to commute
Average distance commuted
Modal shares of different transport modes (mainly walking, cycling, bus, two-wheeler, four-wheeler, three-wheeler, train)
Number of vehicles registered, and the number plying on roads; both by vehicle type
Amount of goods / cargo traffic in the city
Quantity of goods / cargo
Number / type of vehicles
Inter-city transport
Number of vehicles and people boarding / disembarking
By type (ST, private bus, train)
Total road length

Social indicators
% of road length safe, convenient, usable for pedestrians
% of road length safe, convenient, usable for cyclists
% of road length safe, convenient, usable for senior citizens
% of road length safe, convenient, usable for children
Total road length with dedicated, usable cycle tracks (and perhaps total road length with cycle tracks as on official records)
Percentage of family budget spent on travel – classified by economic category
Accidents
Classified by type (fatal, serious, minor)
Classified by victim type (pedestrian, cyclist, …)
Classified by time (early hours, morning, afternoon …)
Classified by region
Public transport indicators
How easy is it to access?
How reliable is it?
How frequent is it?
How ‘consumer-friendly’ is it?
How expensive is it?
How viable is it (earning / expense relationship)?

Environmental indicators
Number of trees cut for road related activities and number planted elsewhere (including details of where cut and where planted)
Air pollution (particulate, non-particulate etc.)
Preferably broken down by region to facilitate impact of proximity to main roads, big parks, wooded sections etc.
No. of vehicles plying with / without PUCs
Fossil fuel consumption (by type, preferably by vehicle also)
Total number and size of public (unpaved) open spaces, gardens and their per-capita values

Some other possible indicators
Employment accessibility (job opportunities within walking distance)
Service accessibility (basic services such as schools, shops, government offices within walking distance)
Vehicle-km travelled per capita per day
Per capita congestion delay
Transport investments (City’s investment into different transport infrastructures)
Transport services for non-drivers, disabled etc.
Noise pollution
Habitat protection / destruction
Mix of fuel shares, % using CNG, % using electric vehicles etc.

PCEF DC Rules Group 10 Jan ppt text

10 Jan 2008
PCEF DC Rules Theme Group

Summary of Discussions
1) We initiated a broad discussion in which members generally spoke and discussed issues facing Pune’s development

2) This broad discussion helped us streamline our first thoughts towards addressing the Gaps / shortcomings in the existing DC Rules

3) The next level of discussions were to be based on deeper understanding and analysis of the existing DC Rules and their interpretations in practice
Circulars, main issue which is making the understanding and interpretation of the DC Rule mechanism very complex

4) A few more meetings and discussions revealed that a Focused Working Group will have to emerge for any value added suggestions towards changing / modifying the existing DC Rule
The issue faced here is time commitment and isolation of this group from the DP Process Committee

5) The last meeting held on January 3, 2008 decided that:
Our Group may not be able to work on actually framing the DC Rules, which will require serious and sustained time commitment and effort much larger than the Group can handle
We may come up with a DIRECTIVE POLICY for DC Rules, which may be used as a guiding principle for further work


Update on Proposed Working

Next meeting – January 12, 2008

We propose to hold a day long workshop in this month to:
–Have focused discussions and debates on the DC Rules
–Identify gaps and data requirements in a more focused way
–Come out with a Draft DIRECTIVE POLICY which can be then taken up for further work

(Aneeta Benninger, Sujit Patwardhan, Ujwal Keskar, Poorva Keskar, Zigisha Mhaskar
Rajiv Raje, Pushkar Kanvinde, Dinesh Girolla, Subhash Ghaisas, Pratima Kisloskar
Shantanu Roy, Anagha Paranjape – Purohit)

PCEF School Group 10 Jan ppt text

10 Jan 2008
PCEF Schools Group

The Schools Group is concerned with the Learning Environment for Children of Pune, with a focus on PMC Schools

The framework of the chapter on schools in the ESR is as below:

The Numbers
Number of PMC schools: 320
Number of children enrolled: 130000
Around 35% of the children in Pune attend PMC elementary schools.

What the law promises
The right to good quality elementary education is guaranteed by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, of which India is a signatory.
Free and compulsory education from age 6-14 is a fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution of India.
Municipal Corporations, councils, ZPs are responsible for elementary education

Implications for PMC Education Dept
The PMC must provide, free of cost, elementary education that is of good quality to each child in the local area.
The schools run by the PMC must provide easy access, enabling environment, opportunity for all-round development to each child.

Major problem areas in PMC schools as seen by child rights activists
1) Access
a) Physical access is often blocked by busy roads, flyovers, rail tracks, digging, parked buses
b) Access is also blocked by lack of relevant documents, language.
2) Enabling environment: Physical environment is usually dismal. Attitude of adults in the school is often equally dismal, discouraging, disparaging.
3) Opportunity for development:
a) Teaching methods remain for the most part uninteresting and irrelevant. As a result, most poor children do not actually learn what they are supposed to be learning.
b) Evaluation methods reward rote learning
c) Absence of facilities and people for anything except ‘covering the syllabus’ and taking exams.

Problems expressed by teachers
1) Complete absence of any sort of autonomy on when and how to teach and evaluate
2) Overload of meaningless clerical jobs
3) Absence of academic leadership from supervisors

Problems expressed by parents
1) Children do not learn even to read and write properly
2) Teachers and principals do not treat parents with respect
3) They are not welcome in the school
4) Children’s progress or lack of it is not communicated properly
5) Children are beaten

Problems expressed by children
1) Teachers beat them and shout at them
2) They are asked to sweep, fetch water and tea
3) They are scolded if they do not understand or ask questions
4) They are scared of exams, especially the scholarship exam
5) Teachers are often absent from the class and then expect them to do unit tests without teaching the lesson properly

Problem areas arising out of administrative matters
1) Funds for elementary education come from: Municipal Corporation, State Government, Centrally Sponsored Schemes (e.g.SSA).
2) Staff appointment and therefore accountability is divided between: State Government, Municipal Corporation Education Dept and other departments (eg cleaning and maintenance)
3) Centrally Sponsored Schemes have to be implemented without questioning and without local adaptation
4) Decisions regarding even simple procedural matters are apparently controlled at state level, leaving PMC Ed Dept seemingly rather powerless, going against the 74th amendment
5) The role and power of the Education Board (Shikshan Mandal) is rather unclear.

Performance Indicators for PMC Schools
1) Learning Environment
2) Staff and Administration
3) Learning Process
4) Learning Outcomes
a) These have been detailed on the basis of norms set by SSA, Unicef, etc
b) These will also include figures on school drop outs or transfer to private schools
5) Financial Efficiency

Learning Environment Indicators are about..
1) Number and quality of classrooms
2) Number and quality of toilets
3) Drinking water
4) Play area
5) Access and safety
6) Cleanliness and maintenance


Staff and Admin Indicators are about..
1) Teacher-pupil ratio
2) Teacher-pupil contact time
3) Availability of other resource persons
4) Supervision/on-site training
5) Performance reviews of teachers and supervisors
6) Role of school Board

Learning Process Indicators are about..
1) Availability of learning materials
2) Availability of facilities for sports, art etc.
3) Classroom processes, including evaluation


Learning Outcomes Indicators
Findings of annual review done by independent body for basic literacy skills
•Class 2
•Class 4
•Class 7

Financial Efficiency Indicators
1) We are studying ways in which indicators can be framed so that budgets are not cut but used more efficiently.
2) The focus for creating indicators will be on inputs planned and outputs delivered within the planned budgetary framework

Progress so far
· Except Financial Indicators, others have been detailed
· SSA has done a detailed review of school infrastructure of all school buildings.
· Data has been made available to us
· SSA/PMC has initiated repair work in a number of schools, data has been made available
· MC has taken a few important decisions regarding cleaning and maintenance of schools, e.g that a separate team be made available for school maintenance work from the ward office, that school cleaning be outsourced to a private firm.
· ARC has not been able to corroborate data on infrastructure as permission needs to be taken in writing

Tasks in hand
1) Gather and cross-check complete information against physical environment indicators along with PMC staff
2) Gather information about status against other indicators
3) Understand financing and budgeting and create financial indicators
4) Jointly with PMC create and publish first report card
5) At all levels, involve existing or newly formed ward level committees, including PMC school user community

RCE Pune

About the UNU-IAS Regional Centre of Expertise in Pune

The United Nations Universities – Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS) has initiated the concept of Regional Centre of Expertise (RCEs) on Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). The UNU-IAS invited Centre for Environment Education (CEE) to initiate identification of partners and help set up RCEs in India. We are in the process of initiating one such RCE in Pune and are exploring possible partnerships under this network.

Tentatively, the RCE in Pune aims to function with the following goals and objectives:

Goal
Promote Education for Sustainable Development in Pune through schools, university and forums for citizens

The objectives are:
1. To contextualize ESD in university education, by enhancing linkages among university departments and those working on urban environment and development issues
2. To improve access to school education in Pune addressing direct and in-direct causes of non-accessibility (such as lack of schools, inadequate water and sanitation, other reasons for drop-outs) as well as quality aspects (content, transaction methods, support material, teacher training etc)
3. To enhance public understanding and engagement in governance, and a variety of social and environmental issues, in the context of sustainable development
4. To evolve a method of networking and governance amongst various actors of the RCE itself in order to help us work together effectively

This RCE is seeking membership of:
- University departments, colleges and specialized higher learning institutes
- Agencies such as local citizens' groups and NGOs concerned with social and environmental issues of the city and access to and quality of school education
- Local and regional government authorities

Proposed / Suggested Activities
Studies and research in the areas of:
School education: access and quality
Slum housing
Waste management
Water management
Biodiversity conservation
Governance
Energy conservation
Climate change mitigation, vulnerability and adaptation
Urban-rural linkages
RCE Pune
Education for Sustainable Urban Development

Report of Activities (July 2006 – Dec 2007

· Proposal to UNU IAS based on prelim discussions with various institutions, NGOs and municipality (July 2006)
· RCE Pune on Sustainable Urban Development received its formal communication about recognition from UNU IAS in January 2007.
· RCE Pune meeting (July 2007)
· In parallel, the Pune Citizens Environment Forum was set up in June 2007

Report on Meeting of July 2007
A meeting of existing partners and potential partners was done in July 2007, at the Dept of Environmental Sciences, University of Pune. An overview of developmental issues in Pune was provided by the Chair, including of existing networks of civil society organizations. A presentation of the RCE concept was done, including of the application process. The focus on Education in the RCE initiative was appreciated, with the observation that long-term sustained educational efforts are often missing in our work. Partners provided their views about the nature of education for sustainable development.

Access and Quality of Basic Education
There was a detailed discussion on working with school curricula. It was felt that externally provided inputs in the form of eco-clubs which reach limited numbers of students are important, but there is a greater need for improving infrastructure and assessing the entire curriculum with a view to enhancing the quality.

The Dept of Education, University of Pune and the Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of Environment Education and Research have expressed their interest in looking at school curricula. Science and Technology Park, and the Dept of Environmental Science are working with the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and their inputs would be useful too. Janwani and Centre for Learning Resources have taken up an initiative to develop performance measures for various aspects of the school system. This work would be complemented by a discussion on the quality aspects.

A School Education working group is envisaged to take up more detailed discussions on access and quality to basic education.

Higher Education
On the topic of formal research and study courses at the university level, the earlier experience of offering a credit course at the post graduate level was discussed. It was felt that while the Dept of Environmental Sciences could take this up as a core course, for other faculty, it may be better to develop a lecture series more suited to the needs of their disciplines. The Centre for Development Studies and Activities, which is an autonomous organization affiliated to the University of Pune offers post graduate programmes in development planning and architecture. The content of some of these courses may be helpful in designing the lecture series.

Student projects and internships were discussed very briefly. Students from Geography Dept would be able to take up local projects.

A product on internship and post-graduate research for local sustainability issues may be developed to help orient higher education to sustainability issues. For more detailed study and research it was felt that one to one discussions would be required with the various departments and institute of higher learning.


Public Education
There wasn’t much discussion on the nature and form of public education that could be taken up through the RCE. The Indira School of Communication and the Film and Television Institute Community Radio described their programmes and interest in taking up local issues.

The constraints related to the use of micro-credit in cities described by the representative from the College of Agricultural Banking. The nature of the informal economy is Pune requires a separate and more detailed discussion, and is to be taken up in a subsequent meeting.


Governance
It was felt that CEE should continue to function as the secretariat. Some more discussions and strengthening of the network are needed before a more formal governance mechanism is worked out. The work already initiated should continue, as should one-to-one discussions with the various local organizations to acquaint them of the RCE concept and to develop work programmes within the RCE framework provided by the UNU.