Showing posts with label Secretariat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Secretariat. Show all posts

Sunday, December 23, 2007

PCEF 6 Oct 2007

PCEF Notes of Meeting
Date: Oct 6, 2007
Venue: Indradhanushya: Citizenship and Environment Education Centre, Dattawadi

Agenda

  1. Environment Status Report (ESR) process to be taken up by PCEF
  2. Updates of progress by theme groups

Environment Status Report
As decided in the inception meeting of the PCEF, one of the tasks that the Forum should take up is the development of a framework for the Environment Status Report ESR). This is a mandatory annual report that municipalities in Maharashtra are required to produce.

The process agreed upon at the meeting is:

1. A core group consisting of Aneeta Benninger, Ranjit Gadgil, Himanshu Kulkarni, Sanskriti Menon, Laxmi Narayan, Ajay Ojha, Vijay Paranjpye (and expandable as per needs) should be set up, to develop an overall framework for the report and for individual chapters
work with the PCEF theme groups and additional groups/ individuals to take up responsibilities for the development of various sections of the ESR, including Indicators for each theme
review and edit the drafts submitted by each group submit a budget to the PMC for developing the framework and content

2. The minutes of this meeting are to be considered as the formal communication to PCEF from PMC to begin work on the ESR

3. Decisions related to content and framework:
a. Currently ESR focuses on PMC’s contribution to environment management. However, achievements by NGOs, Corporates, Citizens Forums and their best practices should be a part of the ESR.
b. The ESR should report on ecological carrying capacity and the footprint of the city and not only sectoral environmental status. This paradigm of environmental status reporting can take into account the impacts of Pune such as due to the sourcing of water from catchments outside Pune and releasing effluents without treatment.
c. A document containing the framework and benchmarks for various sectors of the ESR is one deliverable. This would help to standardize the future ESRs and make them comparable and over time to reveal the changing status of environment
d. Methods for collecting and reviewing data should be standardized; thus data gaps in current data collection systems should also be identified
e. ESR should be based on ‘spatial and temporal’ approach because environmental changes do not happen in sectors. Performance of each municipal ward must be reviewed, ranked and linked to budget allocation. ESR should have two components – status of municipal services offered and status of ambient environment.
f. An ongoing data compilation process may be developed so that data and information from diverse sources can be gathered at one location (online and as a repository)
g. The ESR should be uploaded on the PMC website
h. ESR should have relevant indicators from the Human Development Index (HDI).

The UNDP will be able to provide training to the PMC officials and PCEF on how to develop a city-level Human Development Report. The PMC is to write to JS, JNNURM requesting such a training programme.


School Education
1. The group has met three times. Apart from EE, the School Group is also studying the gaps in the provision of infrastructure, access, enrolment and student-teacher ratios. Several issues such as low enrolment in city centre schools and lack of schools in the periphery have been highlighted; average money spent per student in private schools (such as Aksharnandan and R B Academy) is similar to that spent by municipal schools, with vast difference in quality
2. It was decided that a half-day meeting should be organized to address basic education issues
3. However, the ‘environmental education’ role of the School Group should be addressed and should not be lost in the basic education work that the School Group is otherwise interested in; the EE package may address issues such as traffic, water and sanitation etc and not just nature education
4. Mr. Dhananjay Pardeshi will be the contact person from Education Department of PMC to the PCEF group.


Traffic and Cycling
1. The group has not met, however several suggestions were discussed and it was agreed to form a Cycles and Road Design group consisting of Ashok Sreenivas and Jugal Rathi, and from PMC Vivek Kharwadkar and Dinesh Girolla.
2. The ideas discussed were:
a. Design of cycle tracks, including barriers to motorized vehicles, construction material and surface, width, drainage system, signage, etc
b. A PMC phone number to be allocated for citizens to call and report broken or encroached cycle tracks/ footpaths
c. PMT services can be used to encourage cycles. PMT bus can have collapsible stands where cycles can be hooked. So people will use PMT on main roads and cycles from main road to houses, offices through narrow lanes.
d. Parking fees for bicycles must be cancelled immediately at least at PMC offices, to encourage cycling.
e. After putting adequate resources for cycle tracks in place, PMC should do a publicity campaign to encourage cycling.

(A note has subsequently been developed on the tasks of the Cycle Group; uploaded in the Cycling Theme minutes, to be discussed with Vivek Kharwadkar and Dinesh Girola).

Biodiversity
1. Several activities had been discussed by the BD theme group in the past (including Nature Awareness Areas and Interpretation Centers, Biodiversity Vision for Pune, Output on Pune’s existing gardens (suggestions for enhancing biodiversity), directory of plant nurseries of indigenous species, etc). However, the group has focused on the Baner Pashan Biodiversity Parks as that is a priority project of the PMC
2. Several experts have been consulted for the discussions on the Baner-Pashan Biodiversity Park (Prof. Sanjeev Nalawade, Vijay Paranjpye, Sujit Patwardhan. Dr. Aparna Watve and Ankur Patwardhan etc) and a smaller group is working to finalize the plan and will share the work with the rest of the BD group in the next ten days
3. Some of the broad decisions agreed upon are:
a. Road and plantation being carried on should temporarily be halted and wait for the final plans so that resources are not wasted if the plan is different.
b. Mosaic of ecosystems and elements are to be conserved in the BDP, such as quarry to be used as water body, grassland and plantation of native flora along periphery of wall based on terrain and soil availability
c. Citizens may not understand the mosaic approach immediately, and so it was decided that plantation work by citizens be stopped till the plan is decided.
d. It was agreed that boundary wall work would continue for protection of land, as that is very important to avoid private land owners from staking claim.
e. The hill walks were appreciated and it was decided that a walk would be done on 13th October along with local citizens, corporators, Mayor and party leaders (this has happened, see note appended to these minutes).
f. Signage and nature trails are to be included in the interpretation/ management plan for the park

4. The Municipal Commissioner asked about the status of the Mula Mutha Bird Sanctuary. Mr Khaire updated the group that the land belongs to Forest Dept and private owners (mainly the Wadia family). A proposal is being developed by the Forest Dept. However the Air Force has an objection, as the bird sanctuary is very close to the Airport and poses the danger of bird hits. It was clarified that the Bird Sanctuary is largely for water-based bird and for woodland birds like warblers that may not pose a threat to the aircraft. However this is to be discussed with Air Force.


Present
1. Pravinsinh Pardeshi, Municipal Commissioner
2. Yashwant Khaire, Environment and Garden Dept, PMC
3. Prashant Waghmare, City Engineer, PMC
4. Ashok Rajguru, School Education Dept, PMC
5. Dhananjay Pardeshi, School Education Dept, PMC
6. Sourabh Phadke, PuneAlive
7. Aneeta Benninger-Gokhale, CDSA
8. Tasneem Balasinorwala, Pune Tree Watch
9. Ashish Kothari, Kalpavrish
10. Anchal Sondhi, Pune Tree Watch
11. Sanskriti Menon, CEE
12. Laxmikant Deshpande, CEE
13. Ashok Sreenivas, PTTF
14. Ranjit Gadgil, Janwani
15. Jugal Rathi, Pune Cycle Pratishthan
16. Harshwardhan, ACWADAM
17. Avinash Madhale, CEE
18. Ujwal Keskar, Corporator
19. Erach Bharucha, BVIEER
20. Laxmi Narayan, Waste Matters
21. Himanshu Kulkarni, ACWADAM
22. Zigisha Mhaskar, Independent Consultant
23. Vijay Paranjpye, Gomukh

Creation of PCEF

Discussion on proposed Pune Citizens' Environment Forum, 27th June 2007

Minutes of key issues and decisions

The main purpose of the Pune Citizens' Environment Forum is to advance progress toward sustainable development of Pune, by focusing discussions and action on key environmental issues, and providing a regular forum for interface, exchange of information, planning, and redressal between citizens and the administration.
The role of the PCEF is that of working together and not in an adversarial manner. The need for activism arises when the administration is not responsive or amenable. In Pune, there are tremendous intellectual inputs available from citizens groups and NGOs. However, there are a range of impediments in conversion of these inputs into on-ground implementation, such as capacity gaps, immaturity of democratic processes, etc. The role of CSOs has evolved, and in many parts of India, the government and citizens groups and development professionals are working together to achieve results. Mr Pardeshi stressed the point that the PMC administration looks forward to a solution-oriented mode of work.
The Citizens' Environment Forum (CEF) will address the following themes initially:
a. Water (including rivers and streams)
b. Biodiversity (including green spaces)
c. School education (focusing on environmental education and action)
d. Public education (focusing on the PMC’s role in public education)
e. Environmental aspects of Development Control Rules (waste, water, energy etc)
f. Promotion of Eco-housing
g. Promotion of decentralized waste management and other aspects that require outreach/ public discussion
h. Promotion of non-motorized transport modes (including cycling and footpaths) and other aspects that require outreach/ public discussion
i. Sustainability indicators
Since several of these are linked to each other, a joint consideration of certain aspects will be required. Sustainability indicators need to be identified for each theme.
The Forum will meet once in two months for the first few months, starting June/ July 2007.
The Municipal Commissioner will chair the PCEF and its meetings. The Forum will have Theme Groups and a Secretariat. A table of participation in each Theme is attached.
The mode of operation of the CEF for each theme is envisaged as:
a. Initial meetings with PMC officials, NGOs, researchers, relevant stakeholder representatives on the theme concerned to arrive at the points that are meant for public discussions (policy gaps, data gaps, improvements needed in implementation, roles/ responsibilities of the admin and citizens, etc)
b. Preparation of a base presentation / paper using material from the above meetings, CDP, ESR etc
c. Stakeholder/ Public meeting (with adequate publicity etc) to discuss actionables (with indicators for assessment/evaluation) for PMC and citizens/CSOs etc
d. Consolidation of ideas from public meeting, preparation of strategy papers to be uploaded on PMC website and disseminated through PMC newsletter and other media (press notes, articles, CSO newsletters and websites)
e. Submission of relevant recommendations to the Development Plan Steering Committee/ Planning Committee
The Secretariat of the Forum will be Yashwant Khaire, Sanskriti Menon, Ranjit Gadgil and Shamita Kumar (the latter three in their individual capacity, to clarify that the Secretariat is not linked to any particular CSO). Its key functions will be to
prepare for the meetings, take notes and send out minutes
seek inputs from stakeholders and from relevant officials and CSOs, and
facilitate the initial meetings of the Theme Groups
send minutes of theme groups for uploading onto the PMC website and ourpune.com
The Forum will be linked to, and integrate its outputs with, ongoing formal mandatory processes such as the Development Plan 2007 and the annual Environmental Status Report. Towards this, a. A representative of the CEF will be part of the DP 2007 Steering Committee (Sujit and Ranjit are part of the Steering Committee)
b. Required data from the PMC depts will be made available to the CEF for analysis to feed into the ESR as an ongoing process
c. One agenda item in the meetings of the CEF will be a review of the actions arising out of the ESR of July 2007
d. The Forum could become the platform for the preparation of the ESR, and groups within the Forum should "have ownership" over the ESR process.
Suggestions for specific themes included:
a. Eco-housing training modules can be considered as content for public education
b. Eco-housing group should consider the application of recommended technology to SRA construction
c. Innovative communication methods such as the BNCA initiative at public gardens can be used for public education
d. NIASA may be requested to join the Forum as regular Quality Improvement Programmes are arranged for architects and builders
e. Health issues are to be considered as a cross cut and may be included as indicators of sustainability
f. Ground water needs to be included in the theme on water
Expected outputs
a. Enhanced understanding and awareness about key environmental issues of Pune city
b. Inputs into DP, ESR and annual budgeting and planning processes on key environmental issues
c. Identification of aspects in each theme that need specific actions in terms of additional research, data collection, communication/ outreach, policy advocacy at various levels, etc that can be pursued by citizens groups, research and academic institutions and the PMC
d. Enhanced linkages between administration and citizens/ citizens groups
e. Regular public monitoring of action taken.
The draft Environmental Status Report was presented by the Mr Yashwant Khaire and Dr Ajay Ojha, PMC Environment Cell. Suggestions for the ESR process included:
a. Analysis of trends over the last 10 years
b. Highlight environmental aspects of municipal services, amenities, facilities
c. Access data from non-PMC sources as well (the example of groundwater was highlighted)
d. Disaggregate data and its presentation at the electoral ward level to the extent possible now (waste, diseases, water etc)
e. Put in place data collection methods for the future that enable dis-aggregation of data and its presentation and analysis
f. The CEF themes need to link up with the ESR chapters/ sections
Theme Groups
Secretariat: Yashwant Khaire, Sanskriti Menon, Ranjit Gadgil, Shamita Kumar
Water (including river): Zigisha, Himanshu, Vijay Paranjape, Ramchandra Kowlgi
Biodiversity (including green spaces): Mr Savarkar, Doc, Anchal, Raghu, Saili S Palande, Green Hills, Yashwant Khaire, Ashish Kothari, Laxmikant Deshpande, Veena Dharmaraj, Ruby Ardeshir
Sustainability indicators: Dr Sanap, Ranjit Gadgil, Sanskriti, Laxmi Narayan, Laxmikant Deshpande, Shantanu Roy, Girish Sant
School: Doc Bharucha, Dhanamanjiri Sathe
Public education: Sanskriti, Veena, Anand Agashe, Amarnath Karan, Saroj Badgujar, Poorva Keskar, Anagha Paranjape, Pratima Kirloskar
Promotion of Ecohousing: Veena Dharmaraj, Anagha Paranjape, Aneeta Benninger, Mr Kanvinde (NIASA), Anchal, PBAP, Pratima, Dinesh Girolla, Anchal Sondhi, Poorva Keskar
Environmental aspects of Development Control Rules: Mr Keskar, Aneeta Benninger, Pratima, Anagha, Zigisha Mhaskar, Dinesh Girolla, Sujit Patwardhan, S.V.Ghaisas, Poorva Keskar, Shantanu Roy
Aspects of waste management: Dr VS Ghole, Aapla Parisar, Laxmi Narayan, Poornima Chikarmane, Sudhir V. Gawali, Suhas Khadilkar, Girish Sant
Traffic, cycling and footpaths: Ranjit Gadgil, Sujit Patwardhan